waynez@houxh.UUCP (W.ZAKARAS) (01/03/85)
Come on. What's going on here? Does this team live at the movie theater and read books during intermisssion? I must have read 15 articles that were extremely biased as well as one sided. Secondly does anyone who reads net.movies want book reviews? WayneZ...
moriarty@fluke.UUCP (The Napoleon of Crime) (01/05/85)
I have placed my reply to this in net.flame (article <206@vax2.fluke.UUCP>).
I suggest any discussion on this posting is continued there, so as not to
disturb those who wish to read reviews, etc.
Mr. Considerate,
Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer
John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc.
UUCP:
{cornell,decvax,ihnp4,sdcsvax,tektronix,utcsrgv}!uw-beaver \
{allegra,gatech!sb1,hplabs!lbl-csam,decwrl!sun,ssc-vax} -- !fluke!moriarty
ARPA:
fluke!moriarty@uw-beaver.ARPAchas@ihuxe.UUCP (Charles Lambert) (01/08/85)
> Come on. What's going on here? Does this team live at the movie theater > and read books during intermisssion? I must have read 15 articles > that were extremely biased as well as one sided. Secondly does anyone > who reads net.movies want book reviews? Yes, thankyou, at least one of us out here does enjoy book reviews when they're related to film. As to quantity: it's fortunate that there are contributors prepared to invest the time in producing a regular and broad view movies. As to quality: it is not only inevitable but essential that critique be biased. So long as the bias is consistent it provides a yardstick for the reader. These critiques are written with some respect for grammar and language, and are certainly more controlled in their bias than the casual flames and eulogies found in some other contributions. Charlie Lambert @ the Death Star, Ill.