gudeman@arizona.UUCP (01/24/87)
From: gvcormack@watmum.UUCP (Gordon V. Cormack) Subject: Re: Object-Oriented vs. Abstract Data Types ... 7. I still have not seen a satisfactory definition of O-O. I am not at all sure that one exists. I think it *is* essentially the Simula programming methodology invented 20 years ago by Dahl et al. I have seen at least 3 definitions of objected oriented programming, most people seem to assume one of the following definitions (or some combination). Object Oriented Programming: (1) programming in {Smalltalk, Simula, ...}. (2) programming in a paradigm in which computation is specified by sending messages to objects. (3) programming with data structures that are organized hierarchicly, with inheritance of {methods, operations} I find (1) uninteresting. (2) is probably the original meaning of the term, since it seems most related to the term (*Object* oriented). (3) seems to be the one preferred by Lisp people (who naturally have no use for languages that pass messages). It seems most Smalltalk programmers use a combination of (2) and (3) with occasional shades of (1). Disclaimer of Bias: I'm a C and Icon programmer not an O-O programmer Disclaimer of Stupidity: This is my first posting with the new software, If my .signature occurs twice it's because the documentation is faulty. David Gudeman gudeman@arizona.edu Department of Computer Science ihnp4!arizona!gudeman The University of Arizona 602-621-2858 Tucson, AZ 85721