peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) (03/18/90)
Of course the use of products like Classic Ada destroys the main reason for
developing (let alone using) ADA in the first place: providing a uniform
software development language and environment across the DoD. Classic ADA
is no more ADA than C++ is C.
I think it's time to dust off that old joke about Fortran (what language will
we be using in the next century? I don't know, but it'll be called Fortran!)
and bring it up to date: What languages will the DoD be using in the next
century? I don't now, but they'll all be called ADA!
--
_--_|\ `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.uu.net>.
/ \ 'U`
\_.--._/
v