ekman@wdl30.wdl.loral.com (Donald Ekman) (05/31/91)
Why should these be called "arguments." I haven't the least intention of arguing with my compiler; rather, I would issue command line directives. Who's in charge here, anyway? -- Donald E. Ekman | Disclaimer: Loral | This space reserved for a Space Systems/Loral | doesn't think I have | clever remark or pithy Palo Alto, CA USA | any opinions. They | quote. All donations ekman@wdl30.wdl.loral.com | are probably right. | gratefully accepted.
jf@threel.co.uk (John Fisher) (06/04/91)
yfcw14@castle.ed.ac.uk (K P Donnelly) writes: > Unfortunately Edinburgh University's EMAS operating system is > disappearing exactly one year from now. They are moving over to Unix to > be the same as everyone else. *And* they're abandoning IMP <sniff>... --John %endofprogram
ok@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Richard A. O'Keefe) (06/06/91)
In article <284b63b1@ThreeL.co.uk>, jf@threel.co.uk (John Fisher) writes: > *And* they're abandoning IMP <sniff>... > --John Hooray! "We call it IMP because it's an invention of the Devil..." -- Should you ever intend to dull the wits of a young man and to incapacitate his brains for any kind of thought whatever, then you cannot do better than give him Hegel to read. -- Schopenhauer.