[net.movies] There was an intermission in 200

jimc@haddock.UUCP (06/13/85)

> I saw 2001 the first week it was out in Pittsburgh.  A group of 
> us went downtown to see it after school (gad that was a long time 
> ago).  Not only was there an intermission, but a lot of the 
> sequences were longer, increasing the total length of the movie.  
> I also remember that I was one of the few who enjoyed it.  Any 
> others out there who remember...  "The Ultimate Trip"?  

Indeed I do.  I saw it when it was out in one of its secondary 
runs, in the spring of 1971, to be precise.  I was only eight 
years old, and I was passionately interested in the space 
program, as was typical of children at that time.  The 
unfortunate thing was the movie scared the living daylights out 
of me.  Particularly, it was the image of the Starchild, which 
Kubrick portrayed as an Earth-sized fetus that resembled Dave 
Bowman (Keir Dullea).  I remember crying myself to sleep every 
night for a month, and I was still nervous about it for a few 
months after that.  I had no idea then why I was so scared, and I 
still don't.  Perhaps it was seeing something that appeared only 
vaguely human, yet knowing that such things exist and that I used 
to be one of them.  However, I am only guessing -- I suppose I 
will never know.  

About three weeks ago, I went to a popular cinema in Brookline, 
MA, which specializes in older pictures (the Coolidge Corner 
Theatre, for all you Bostonians), and there I saw *2001* for the 
first time in fourteen years.  Of course, the memory of my 
childhood trauma made me somewhat nervous, but it didn't stop me 
from enjoying the movie immensely.  I read the book a couple of 
times while I was in college, and I have to say that the book is 
better, but there is nothing wrong with this picture at all.  
Yes, we, too, had an intermission, which I thought was a drag, 
because I was in no hurry to get up from this movie.  

My fiancee's comment was that it was a very elegant movie.  What 
I respected about it was Kubrick's attention to physical 
realities at the expense of some cinematic thrills.  When 
spaceships went whizzing across the lunar surface or into space, 
they didn't "roar" like they do in the sci-fi/fantasy flicks of 
the 70's and 80's.  I thought the silence was far more engrossing 
than, say, what we saw in *2010*.  

Also, remember when HAL told Dave that he had read the lips of 
himself and colleague Frank Poole as they were discussing 
disconnecting HAL, and that for that reason, he would leave Dave 
in a very precarious position (which I won't divulge)?  Bowman 
took that very stoically, whereas I would have pulled a complete 
"Richard Burton" and said something like, "Why, you slimy, 
conniving, silicon BASTARD!!!" 

I sure hope this movie remains respected until the year 2001 and far
afterward.

				Jim Campbell
				...!ihnp4!ima!haddock!jimc