arun@dsrgsun.ces.cwru.edu (Arun Lakhotia) (01/12/89)
Talking about efficiency of perfect number generation programs. The one that I had posted earlier is about 6000 times faster than the best of others posted on the net. What follows is a comparison of 3 programs and the reason behind the differences. CLASSIFICATION -------------- All programs posted were of generate and test type. They may be classified in three categories (P1, P2, and P3) on the basis of the algorithm they use for: generation of numbers upto 'N' A) generate all integers, or -- O(N) B) generate powers of 2 -- O(log2(N)) testing for 'perfect'-ness of some number 'M' C) get list of divisors by dividing from 1..M//2, or -- O(M) D) or by dividing from 1.. sqrt(M), or -- O(sqrt(M)) E) check for primeness by dividing from 1..sqrt(M) -- O(sqrt(M)) Programs\Algo used --> generate test O(generate * test) v P1 A C O(N * N) P2 A D O(N * sqrt(N)) P3 B E O(log2(N) * sqrt(N)) My program belonged to category P3 NOTE: The above complexity measures do not include complexities due to unification, choice-points creation. They are just algorithmic complexities. SOME FIGURES ------------ Following are run times for 3 program instances of these categories for running under two popular Prolog systems on a Sun 3/60. All times are in SECONDS. The figures for P3 are averaged over 1000 iterations for accuracy. Others are over 2, 5, 10 iterations depending on how much patience they required. Prolog System I N --> 496 8128 33550336 Beyond P1 32.78 Stack Overflow P2 12.99 740.89 Patience Overflow P3 0.0083 0.01501 0.066 Arithmetic Overflow Prolog System II N --> 496 8128 33550336 Beyond P1 12.5 Stack Overflow P2 0.66 30.525 Patience Overflow P3 0.0031 0.0056 0.025 Arithmetic Overflow THE PROGRAM ----------- Theorems posted by Dale Miller provide a foundation for developing P3 type programs. My program had scope for further improvement. (Re: Saumya Debray's posting on improvement of efficiency of 'isprime'). Arun PS: Let's move on to some other program :-)
dave@quintus.uucp (David Bowen) (01/14/89)
/* There seems to be some suggestion that the question of perfect numbers has been worked to death. Not so! Previous programs have used the theorem: > if (2^p-1) is a (mersenne) prime > then (2^p-1) * 2^(p-1) is a perfect number. The program below makes use of the fact that there are not many values of p for which 2^p-1 is a prime, and the first 24 of them are listed in Knuth's "The Art of Computer Programming", Volume 2. (Look in the index under "Mersenne primes".) These values of p are tabulated below. This program uses the Quintus library package "long" to handle the large integers which are involved. I'm sorry to say that it runs up against a current limitation in "long" that exponents over 9999 are not allowed. All the same, it does manage to generate 22 perfect numbers, the last of which is a 5985 digit number (if I counted correctly). That number (p=9941) took 199.5 seconds to generate on a Sun-3/60. The first 12 numbers, with the times taken to generate them on a Sun-3/60, are: 6 [P=2, 0.017 sec] 28 [P=3, 0.033 sec] 496 [P=5, 0.033 sec] 8128 [P=7, 0.017 sec] 33550336 [P=13, 0.016 sec] 8589869056 [P=17, 0.033 sec] 137438691328 [P=19, 0.017 sec] 2305843008139952128 [P=31, 0.033 sec] 2658455991569831744654692615953842176 [P=61, 0.033 sec] 191561942608236107294793378084303638130997321548169216 [P=89, 0.033 sec] 13164036458569648337239753460458722910223472318386943117783728128 [P=107, 0.050 sec] 14474011154664524427946373126085988481573677491474835889066354349131199152128 [P=127, 0.100 sec] */ :- ensure_loaded(library(long)). % for eval/[1,2], portray_number/1 portray(N) :- portray_number(N). perfect_numbers :- mersenne_prime_exponent(P), statistics(runtime, [T0|_]), eval((2^P)-1, M), % M = 2^P-1 is a Mersenne prime eval(M*(2^(P-1)), N), % N = M*2^(P-1) statistics(runtime, [T1|_]), Time is T1 - T0, format('~p~n[P=~p, ~3D sec]~n~n', [N, P, Time]), fail. perfect_numbers. mersenne_prime_exponent(2). mersenne_prime_exponent(3). mersenne_prime_exponent(5). mersenne_prime_exponent(7). mersenne_prime_exponent(13). mersenne_prime_exponent(17). mersenne_prime_exponent(19). mersenne_prime_exponent(31). mersenne_prime_exponent(61). mersenne_prime_exponent(89). mersenne_prime_exponent(107). mersenne_prime_exponent(127). mersenne_prime_exponent(521). mersenne_prime_exponent(607). mersenne_prime_exponent(1279). mersenne_prime_exponent(2203). mersenne_prime_exponent(2281). mersenne_prime_exponent(3217). mersenne_prime_exponent(4253). mersenne_prime_exponent(4423). mersenne_prime_exponent(9689). mersenne_prime_exponent(9941). mersenne_prime_exponent(11213). mersenne_prime_exponent(19937).