gessel@cs.swarthmore.edu (Daniel Mark Gessel) (07/07/90)
There's a specification of Prolog III in the latest issue of Communications
of the ACM.
My experience suggests that if I write an Implementation of it, I'm free to
do what I want with it (i.e. sell it), But I don't know this for a fact.
Does anyone?
(This may have belonged on some other newsgroup, but I figured people here
may be thinking the same thing).
Thanks in advance,
Dan
--
Internet: gessel@cs.swarthmore.edu
UUCP: {bpa,cbmvax}!swatsun!gesselgessel@cs.swarthmore.edu (Daniel Mark Gessel) (07/08/90)
There is an article in the July 1990 issue of Communications of the ACM about
Prolog III. It gives an explanation of semantic issues involved, from a
theoretical point of view, but there is no syntactic specification.
Does anybody have any info on such a beast?
There is a reference to:
Colmerauer A. Final specifications for Prolog III, Esprit I project,
P1106. February, 1988.
Does anyone know if this has what I want, and if it is available in a journal
or something?
Thanks,
Dan
--
Internet: gessel@cs.swarthmore.edu
UUCP: {bpa,cbmvax}!swatsun!gesselpurvis@niccolo.sw.mcc.com (M Purvis) (10/06/90)
Is there a UNIX version of Prolog III available? Thanks, Martin Purvis -- Martin Purvis purvis@mcc.com