[comp.lang.forth] double length

ir230@sdcc6.ucsd.EDU (john wavrik) (08/11/88)

In the Forth-79 standard double length numbers were required to have the
least significant word (cell) below the most significant on the stack
(this appears in the section on glossary notation).  This is also true
in F83 -- but I have just come upon a non-standard Forth (Uniforth) in
which the order is reversed.  

Does Forth-83 preserve the requirement that the LSW be on the bottom?
(or is the placement regarded as implementation-dependent?).  Are there
popular versions of Forth-83 in which the order is switched?

					      John J Wavrik
					      Dept of Math
					      Univ of Calif at San Diego
jjwavrik @ ucsd.edu