wmb@MITCH.ENG.SUN.COM (02/27/91)
> Well, although Jack's actions were not done during a meeting, they were all > made publicly and we all knew precisely what he did. There was no need for > charges to be brought against him. Thus there was no need for him to be given > the chance to defend himself against any charges. The facts were self evident > in this case. There was no hearing and there were no accusations. The Board > voted on the public evidence (most of which is still here today). I think this is crap. Mitch Bradley, wmb@Eng.Sun.COM