oneel@heawk1.rosserv.gsfc.nasa.gov ( Bruce Oneel ) (04/16/91)
Ok, we have the following was to develope windows applications. 1. MSC and SDK. Need I say more? 2. Actor. Kind of neat, but seems slow and big. 3. BC++. Ditto above, seems a bit kludged 4. TPW. Cleaner than BC++ or MSC/SDK, but now you're talking pascal. 5. Others??? How about a forth? I know (I've been out of this newsgroup for a while) that LMI was working on an OS/2 forth which looked good, but how about windows? Now, how about windows forth either PD/shareware or cheap enough so that it could become popular? There is no current easy way to develop windows applications... bruce -- | Bruce O'Neel | internet : oneel@heasfs.gsfc.nasa.gov| | Code 664/STX | span : lheavx::oneel | | NASA/GSFC Bld 28/W281 |compuserve: 72737,1315 | | Greenbelt MD 20771 | AT&Tnet : (301)-286-4585 | Thats me in the corner, thats me in the spotlight, losin' my religion -- rem