UNBCIC@BRFAPESP.BITNET (04/26/91)
I like a lot! Now I can make a behavior for a vocabulary, something
like what I do with DOES>. The problem with the non nameless vocabularies is
that the user must always provide the vocabulary name (or you would have to
do some strange things). It have something of dynamic variables, also. You
can build trees with them! (hehehe :-)
Anyway, it, somehow, provides control over the vocabularies. They
were always black boxes, and now we have something more understandble. They
still are black boxes. You have just an ID, like files handles. But from there
you can do everything you want (in a standard way, of course... should I use
IASW?).
Thanks for putting this in the standard, Mitch,
(8-DCS)
Daniel C. Sobral
UNBCIC@BRFAPESP.BITNET
P.S.: Too much "like XXX"? Yes, I know....