[comp.lang.smalltalk] Smalltalk on Amiga, RESULTS

thomas@sertne.Dayton.NCR.COM (Scott A. Thomas) (09/11/87)

First of all thanks to everyone who responded to my question about the 
availability of Smalltalk on the Amiga.  

The results were that there appears to be a PD version on Fish disk #37.  This
version does not support the graphical interface but is apparently written in
C so a person can easily add new features.  At this point I have not received
any responses that describe a version that does support a graphical interface.
I personally would be willing to pay a reasonable amount of money for such a 
system, since there is a version of Smalltalk/V for a PC that supports a mouse,
and graphics and cost less that $100.  And the PC is braindamaged when it comes
to hi-res graphics and mice.

Maybe there'll be a better version out in the near future after the A2000 
becomes available.

Thanks again.


-- 
Scott A. Thomas  	CSNET	(thomas@sertne.Dayton.NCR.COM)
NCR Corporation		Voice:  (513) 865-8119
SE-Retail, SER-2	Disclaimer:  These are only my thoughts and not my 
Dayton, OH  45479		     employers.

ralph@mit-atrp.UUCP (Amiga-Man) (09/12/87)

I'll put in my vote for it too:
  Someone please do a heavy-duty version of Smalltalk for the Amiga
that does graphics and mice ! I'd buy it.

mwm@eris.BERKELEY.EDU (Mike (My watch has windows) Meyer) (09/15/87)

In article <188@sertne.Dayton.NCR.COM> thomas@sertne.Dayton.NCR.COM (Scott A. Thomas) writes:
<The results were that there appears to be a PD version on Fish disk #37.  This
<version does not support the graphical interface but is apparently written in
<C so a person can easily add new features.

1) There is support for the Unix plot(3?) routines in Little
Smalltalk. I have an untested implementation of those routines for the
Amiga. You're welcome to them if you want them. But I wouldn't
recommend it, because:

2) Dr. Budd (the author of the system) recommends against hacking on
Little Smalltalk to try and turn it into something approaching a
full-blown smalltalk. It was written so he could teach his students
about object-oriented programming on Unix with ASCII terminals. It's
great for that, but is to slow for real applications. However:

3) If you're going to use Little Smalltalk to play with Smalltalk, get
Dr. Budds book "A Little Smalltalk." It's well written, and guides you
through object-oriented programming quite nicely. About half of it
discusses the guts of Little Smalltalk, and should probably be
required if you want to hack on it.

<I personally would be willing to pay a reasonable amount of money for such a 
<system, since there is a version of Smalltalk/V for a PC that supports a mouse,
<and graphics and cost less that $100.  And the PC is braindamaged when it comes
<to hi-res graphics and mice.

How about Scheme + SCOOPS or a Common LISP + Common LOOPS with hooks
for graphics? I'd prefer that to Smalltalk, and a good LISP system for
the Amiga is something I'm going to take a crack at in the foreseeable
future.

	<mike
--
The handbrake penetrates your thigh.			Mike Meyer
A tear of petrol is in your eye.			mwm@berkeley.edu
Quick, let's make love before we die.			ucbvax!mwm
On warm leatherette.					mwm@ucbjade.BITNET