[comp.lang.smalltalk] Smalltalk vs. straight PM

kef@sactoh0.UUCP (Keith E. Flower) (07/21/90)

Would anyone care to comment on the advantages/disadvantages of
using Smalltalk PM for large projects with complex user interface
requirements?  Specifically:
 
     - learning curve for non-Smalltalk, non-OOP programmers
     - memory overhead of Smalltalk PM.
     - execution speed of Smalltalk PM.
     - interface to C and accessibility of standard PM calls.
     - support by Digitalk.
     - debugging aids.
     - availability of experienced Smalltalk programmers.
 
Thanks very much.
 
-- 
#############################################################
#       THIS SPACE            #  SAC-UNIX, Sacramento, Ca.  #  
#        FOR RENT             # UUCP=..ames!pacbell!sactoh0 #
########################default .sig#########################

CHRIS_LAVENDER_WADE@cup.portal.com (07/30/90)

It will take about two months to be comfortable with Smalltalk PM. They have a
good tutorial.
Memory requirements are 4-6 MBytes.
Speed is about 1.2 to 4 time slower than C (can't narrow down any better
without knowing what you are doing).

CHRIS_LAVENDER_WADE@cup.portal.com (07/30/90)

More:
Interface to C is through DLLs so very elegant, and reasonable access to PM
interface.
Support from Digitalk is very good.
Debugging is about the best you can find! (No help with your C though)
Smalltalk programmers are a rarer breed than C.