dr1b@cive.ri.cmu.edu (Dionysis Rigopoulos) (04/13/91)
I just run into this problem and the tech support at ParcPlace opens again on Monday, so I thought I may get some help from the net... (May be after all some of the ParcPlace guys read this bboard during the weekends :-) ) I am trying to transfer the code I developed in version 2.3 to Objectworks 2.5 and run out of space (on a Mac ci with 8 MB of memory, where memory should not be a problem). I run Objectworks under multifinder, so I played with different values of required memory, and was surprised by the results: With 4000 K of required memory, after garbage collecting I have 792036 free bytes. With 6971 K of memory, I only get 1421900 free bytes. Where do the remaining bytes of the addional memory go? Actually, I had the exact same memory problem with a 386 some months ago, and blamed the machine. The code I try to file in is about 240 K, but I very very early run out of space (after filing in about 1/15 of it - less than 20 methods!!) Any suggestions, opinions, statements of sympathy, are badly needed... Thanks, Dionysis -- Dionysis R. Rigopoulos dr1b@cive.ri.cmu.edu
warner@scubed.com (Ken Warner) (04/14/91)
In article <12659@pt.cs.cmu.edu> dr1b@cive.ri.cmu.edu (Dionysis Rigopoulos) writes: [stuff deleted] > I am trying to transfer the code I developed in version 2.3 to Objectworks >2.5 and run out of space (on a Mac ci with 8 MB of memory, where memory [etc] > I run Objectworks under multifinder, so I played with different values >of required memory, and was surprised by the results: >With 4000 K of required memory, after garbage collecting I have 792036 free >bytes. With 6971 K of memory, I only get 1421900 free bytes. Where do the Forget the numbers, they don't tell you anything useful. I run large (>4 meg) images all the time on a Mac II and IIcx. The tricks I use: First get 16 Meg of real memory and Maxima from Connectix. If you can't swing 16 Meg of real memory get Virtual from Connectix. Both give you a little over 14 Meg of memory *UNDER FINDER*. Under MultiFinder you will only get 8 Meg - System - Finder memory *THIS IS IT...ALL YOU GET...YOU DON'T GET NO MORE!* I have the application memory size set to 7000k and my System cut down to a little less than 1 Meg. Few INIT's, CDEV's and/or DA's. Configured this way I can run Smalltalk with a 4+ Meg image, MS-Word and a draw program. But I garbage collect *ALOT*. So if I have a lot of hacking to do and I don't want to garbage collect every 4 minutes, I run under Finder. Finder will let you use all 14 Meg of memory. It works great! Remember I'm using Connectix stuff. Last meaningful trick: Inspect Object class variable DependentFields. This guy can sponge up a lot of zombies. But be careful what you loose from DependenFields--you can really hose yourself. Cheers! Ken Warner warner@scubed.scubed.com
ags@scs.carleton.ca (Alexander George Morison Smith) (04/15/91)
In article <12659@pt.cs.cmu.edu> dr1b@cive.ri.cmu.edu (Dionysis Rigopoulos) writes: > I am trying to transfer the code I developed in version 2.3 to Objectworks >2.5 and run out of space (on a Mac ci with 8 MB of memory, where memory >should not be a problem). I just use 2.3 :-) You can probably fix your problem with out of memory during file-in by inserting a few Smalltalk garbageCollect (or whatever the method name is) in appropriate places in the file you are filing in. That way it will do a garbage collect and give you more free memory / objects for the rest of the file-in. It seems that garbage collection isn't as automatic as we users wish it is during file-in and other times. By the way, if you creat a huge object in 2.5 and then dereference it, you will find that you have more free memory after dereferencing it than before creating it. I susupect that PP 2.5 only allocates memory from the Mac OS as it needs it. - Alex