[comp.lang.lisp] Performance comparison

steve@siemens.UUCP (Steve Clark) (02/19/88)

We have used Xerox Dandelion lisp machines in the past and now we are
considering new machines for a new project.  This new project is to be
written in Common Lisp using Portable Common Loops or the Common Lisp Object
System and some kind of X-window-based package like the Common Lisp User
Environment or Common Windows.  (The purpose is so the software is portable,
because in the end it should run on whatever low-end machine replaces the
PC, that's relatively cheap and suitable for a factory evironment.)

We think the best machine to get is the new Sun-4/110, but management prefers
Apollo to Sun.  We solicit comparisons, both performance and environment.  If
you have used Common Lisp on Apollos and on Suns, then please let me know
what the difference is.  Thank you very much.

(My personal opinion is that the best option will be Xerox's, when they finish
migrating to Common Lisp and Sun-4's, but that's two or three years off.)

Steve Clark, steve@siemens.com -or- ...!princeton!siemens!steve