murray@sq.UUCP (11/27/86)
In article <3927@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU> thakur@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU (Manavendra K. Thakur) writes: > >I would like to know more about the movie "Woodstock." Is it a >documentary or is it more of a concert film? I know that it is three >hours long. What I want to know is whether the film is a boring >documentary that college-age people won't see or whether the film is >reasonably interesting enough to draw people to see it. > >P.S. In case you're wondering, I am trying to get the film group here >at MIT to show the film. There was some question as to whether >people would come to see it today or not; that's why I asking for >others' opinions. Woodstock is a pop/rock-documentary. For those who still enjoy the music of the late sixties, the film would be enjoyable. On second viewing, it might even be educational. But it is not a great film. The sound recording quality was not up to our current standards, and the projected image is often fuzzy. Murray C. Maloney