mek4_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Mark Kern) (02/08/91)
Hi, thanks to all those who replied about my Kyoto Common Lisp question. It appears that I have been extremely naive in hoping that a version of KCL would run on the IBM. Apparently there are a few factors that make this a tough thing to do. One problem is sheer disk space and memory space required (the 640k on the IBM being a definite barrier to the later). Another problem deals with the strange and convoluted way that KCL is written. I was sketchy on these last details, but it seemed daunting enough. I would like to retract my previous question on KCL. However, if you know of any good public domain Common Lisp alternatives for the IBM, I would be very interested in hearing from you. Thanks, Mark E. Kern