mhyman@hsfmsh.UUCP (Marco S. Hyman) (07/13/89)
The recent discussions on legal review of software licenses and copyrights provides four new reasons why software is neither on budget nor on schedule: 1. Legal fees (for license review) were mis-judged in the initial estimate. 2. The time waiting for the lawers to review the various licenses was mis-judged in the initial estimate. 3. The extra time required due to use of the wrong tool (because the lawyers won't let you use the right tool) was not planned for. 4. The extra time required to make a tool (because the lawyers won't let you use any other tool) was not planned for. Of course, the phrase ``the lawyer won't let...'' means ``company management won't let'' unless blessed by the lawyers. --marc -- //Marco S. Hyman //UUCP: ...!sun!sfsun!hsfmsh!mhyman //Domain: sfsun!hsfmsh!mhyman@sun.com
jima@hplsla.HP.COM (Jim Adcock) (07/15/89)
>If you want to develop applications to hoard, develop a library to hoard. If >you don't want everyone to have to develop a hoardable library, sell a g++ >compatible library of your classes (not built from libg++) to other hoarders. >Don't complain because FSF won't let you sell THEIR code. Again, who wrote libg++? Stallman? -- I doubt it.