lpw@jvc.UUCP (Lance Welsh) (09/27/89)
How does pointer arithmetic work when:
- the type of the pointer is of a base class type, and
- the object pointed to is derived from that type, and
- the size of the derived type changed by introducing new member variables?
For Instance,
#include <stdio.h>
class B { public: int b; B() { b=1; } };
class D : public B { public: int d; D() { d=2; } };
const int ARRAY_SIZE=10;
main ()
{ D d[ARRAY_SIZE];
for (B* p=d; p<&d[ARRAY_SIZE]; p++) // will p increment by 4 or 8?
printf ("p=%x b=%d (size=%d)\n", p, p->b, sizeof(*p));
}
Is this the same question as how does sizeof work in similar circumstances?
If it is said that it is OK for sizeof to compute its value with compile-time
type information, ignoring what it may point at during run-time, OK.
But that does not seem to work so well with pointer arithmetic.
Just curious - apologies if it has been covered before.
-Lance P. Welsh uunet!jvc!lpw JVC Laboratory of America (408) 988-4675ark@alice.UUCP (Andrew Koenig) (09/28/89)
In article <543@jvc.UUCP>, lpw@jvc.UUCP (Lance Welsh) writes: > How does pointer arithmetic work when: > - the type of the pointer is of a base class type, and > - the object pointed to is derived from that type, and > - the size of the derived type changed by introducing new member variables? You can only do arithmetic on a pointer if you know the actual type of the object to which it points and that object is an element of an array. -- --Andrew Koenig ark@europa.att.com