[comp.lang.c++] Query on using libg++ with AT&T's C++ translator

paul@gill.UUCP (Paul Nordstrom) (09/28/89)

In article <1989Sep27.223222.26655@odi.com> dlw@odi.com writes:
>
>If you're really trying to compile libg++ using AT&T's C++, you have a
>lot more problems ahead of you.  g++ is not compatible with C++.  g++
>even has lexical tokens that are not present in C++.  So don't expect
>
.
.
.
>Dan Weinreb		Object Design, Inc.		dlw@odi.com


What is the extent of these differences?  Is it feasible to write code
to run under both compilers?  Has the differences between the two compilers
widened or narrowed with the introduction of 2.0?  Are "incompatible" ( :-) )
features being added to g++ on an ongoing basis?

-- 
Paul Nordstrom
Gill & Co., L.P.
uunet!gill!paul