psrc@pegasus.ATT.COM (Paul S. R. Chisholm) (10/15/89)
// The following appears to work in AT&T cfront 2.0. I don't know why
// anyone would want to do such a thing (I found source code I wrote
// littered with this oddity, and can't remember why *I* wanted to do
// such a thing). Is it reasonable, gross but legal, or should even
// cfront reject it?
class foo {
int i; // I feel better with at least one member
public:
// anyone normal would say:
// foo() { i = 0; }
// but I appear able to say instead:
foo::foo() { i = 0; }
};
// Paul S. R. Chisholm, AT&T Bell Laboratories
// att!pegasus!psrc, psrc@pegasus.att.com, AT&T Mail !psrchisholm
// I'm not speaking for the company, I'm just speaking my mind.