oz@yunexus.UUCP (Ozan Yigit) (10/02/89)
Is there a complete description of the g++ grammar, that is not copyrighted (i.e. not the yacc file) that I can obtain ?? please reply via e-mail. thnx.. oz -- The king: If there's no meaning Usenet: oz@nexus.yorku.ca in it, that saves a world of trouble ......!uunet!utai!yunexus!oz you know, as we needn't try to find any. Bitnet: oz@[yulibra|yuyetti] Lewis Carroll (Alice in Wonderland) Phonet: +1 416 736-5257x3976
tkacik@rphroy.UUCP (Tom Tkacik) (10/02/89)
In article <4054@yunexus.UUCP> oz@yunexus.UUCP (Ozan Yigit) writes: >Is there a complete description of the g++ grammar, that is not Is there a complete description of the C++ grammar? None of the books I have looked at give it. Either C++ 1.2 or 2.0. What should be used as the reference for solving syntax questions? -- --- Tom Tkacik GM Research Labs, Warren MI 48090 uunet!edsews!rphroy!megatron!tkacik Work Ph: (313)986-1442 "If you can't stand the bugs, stay out of the roach-motel." Ron Guilmette
wmm@sdti.com (William M. Miller) (10/19/89)
In article <17623@rphroy.UUCP> tkacik@rphroy.UUCP (Tom Tkacik) writes: >Is there a complete description of the C++ grammar? None of the books >I have looked at give it. Either C++ 1.2 or 2.0. >What should be used as the reference for solving syntax questions? The 2.0 Reference Manual, available from AT&T by itself or bundled with the cfront source (about 3 orders of magnitude difference in price between those two options :-), has a complete grammar. It's not perfect, but it's quite good. Bjarne is working on a book for implementors of the language and technically sophisticated users which will be published in a few months which will also be complete and authoritative. -- Non-disclaimer: My boss and I always see eye-to-eye (every time I look in the mirror). ...!genrad!mrst!sdti!wmm