[comp.lang.c++] Just a silly simple lil' question

eprice@sagpd1.UUCP (Eric Price) (10/11/89)

	Howdy Fellow Netlanders,

	Just a silly simple lil' question that's been keeping me
	awake for nights ...

		is it C++: 'see plus plus'

				or

		is it C++: 'see plus'

	after all i++ in 'C' is i plus 1 ... I'm confused ...
	but enquiering minds demand to know

	PS: Sorry to beat this topic to death ... ect, ect

					eric

johnhall@microsoft.UUCP (John Hall) (10/13/89)

In article <489@sagpd1.UUCP> eprice@sagpd1.UUCP (Eric Price) writes:
>		is it C++: 'see plus plus'
>				or
>		is it C++: 'see plus'

Actually, it is C incremented.

------------------

My views do not reflect the views of my company.

rhbartels@watcgl.waterloo.edu (Richard Bartels) (10/13/89)

>In article <489@sagpd1.UUCP> eprice@sagpd1.UUCP (Eric Price) writes:
>
>Actually, it is C incremented.
>

More properly, it is C postincremented.

-Richard

cowan@marob.masa.com (John Cowan) (10/17/89)

In article <8025@microsoft.UUCP> johnhall@microsoft.UUCP (John Hall) writes:
>In article <489@sagpd1.UUCP> eprice@sagpd1.UUCP (Eric Price) writes:
>>		is it C++: 'see plus plus'
>>				or
>>		is it C++: 'see plus'
>
>Actually, it is C incremented.
>
>------------------
>
>My views do not reflect the views of my company.


Actually, it is pronounced Seymour.

i
n
e
w
s

f
o
d
d
e
r
-- 
Internet/Smail: cowan@marob.masa.com	Dumb: uunet!hombre!marob!cowan
Fidonet:  JOHN COWAN of 1:107/711	Magpie: JOHN COWAN, (212) 420-0527
		Charles li reis, nostre emperesdre magnes
		Set anz toz pleins at estet in Espagne.

rob@phavl.UUCP (Robert Ransbottom) (10/19/89)

>>>		is it C++: 'see plus plus'
>>>		is it C++: 'see plus'
>>Actually, it is C incremented.
>Actually, it is pronounced Seymour.

Try "sink" or "kink" dependending on emotional state, ethnic origin,
or sexual preferences/mores.

-- 
rob

greyfox@agtoa.UUCP (Bruce Ide) (10/24/89)

In article <11891@watcgl.waterloo.edu>, rhbartels@watcgl.waterloo.edu (Richard Bartels) writes:
> >
> >Actually, it is C incremented.
> >
> 
> More properly, it is C postincremented.

Have you heard about the new object oriented COBOL? 
ADD ONE TO COBOL

(Sorry if you've heard this one before. A consultant told it to me.)