david@ics.ics.COM (David B. Lewis) (01/19/90)
Certainly -- isn't it double-plus good? Do people have opinions on the new Dewey/Starkhurst book (or other books) as a good tutorial and pseudo-reference manual for C programmers? (Sorry if I've missed early reviews; replies by email would be much appreciated.) David B. Lewis david@ics.com david%ics.UUCP@bu.edu ...!uunet!ics.com!david Any given program, when running correctly, is obsolete.
drs@bnlux0.bnl.gov (David R. Stampf) (01/20/90)
In article <1990Jan19.153233.27884@ICS.COM> david@ics.ics.COM (David B. Lewis) writes: >Do people have opinions on the new Dewey/Starkhurst book (or other books) >as a good tutorial and pseudo-reference manual for C programmers? I think the book is a wonderful tutorial (even for self teaching) but it is a rather poor reference -- no table of operator precedence for example. I'll be teaching a C++ course here in a couple of months, and I will use that book and Bjarne's for a reference work. < dave