mdm@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Michael McDaniel) (08/06/90)
HELP! I just bought THINK C 4.0 and am trying to work with C++. I bought
"Using C++" by Bruce Eckel (pub:OsborneMcGraw-Hill). It directs me to
#include <iostream.h>, but I can find no file. Nor can I make the cout
command work. Anybody out there who could help would be greatly
appreciated. I am on the net at 1200 baud, so please email to me. THANK
YOU!
Michael
mdm@dartmouth.edu
mdm@eleazar.dartmouth.edu
--
Michael McDaniel Dartmouth Class of 1991 | HB 2285
Usenet (UUCP): ...!{harvard,linus,att}!dartvax!mdm | Hanover, NH
Internet/BITNET: mdm@dartmouth.edu | 03755
And you chowder-head yokel, you blithering hayseed, you've had enough of me?keithb@hpward.hp.com (08/07/90)
In article <23512@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> mdm@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Michael McDaniel) writes: >HELP! I just bought THINK C 4.0 and am trying to work with C++. I bought >"Using C++" by Bruce Eckel (pub:OsborneMcGraw-Hill). It directs me to >#include <iostream.h>, but I can find no file. Nor can I make the cout >command work. Anybody out there who could help would be greatly >appreciated. I am on the net at 1200 baud, so please email to me. THANK >YOU! > > >Michael > Think C is NOT a full version of C++. It is C with objects, a subset of C++. No new keywords were introduced, and things like new() and delete() were implemented as functions. Further, there is no <iostream.h>. Hopefully, Symantec will implement a full version of C++ in release 5.0. You're welcome. Keith Hewlett-Packard Medical Products Group
cory@three.mv.com (Cory Kempf) (08/13/90)
keithb@hpward.hp.com writes: >Think C is NOT a full version of C++. It is C with objects, a subset >of C++. No new keywords were introduced, and things like new() and >delete() were implemented as functions. Further, there is no ><iostream.h>. Hopefully, Symantec will implement a full version >of C++ in release 5.0. Probably not. I talked with some people from Think at MacWorld. The guy that I talked to seemed to imply that they were planning on adding C++-isms to TC, but were not planning on making TC into C++ -- maybe a seperate product someday if they could figure out how to do it right (his words, not mine). His main defense was that C++ is a moving target, and that they wanted to do it right [e.g. not CFront -- +C]. +C -- Cory Kempf I do speak for the company (sometimes). The EnigamI Co. 603 883 2474 email: cory@three.mv.com, harvard!zinn!three!cory -- Cory Kempf I do speak for the company (sometimes). The EnigamI Co. 603 883 2474 email: cory@three.mv.com, harvard!zinn!three!cory