[comp.lang.c++] THE definite refernece to C++

L98CC@CUNYVM (10/07/90)

Which book is the definte reference to C++ language that is comprehensive
enough to derive a compiler from?


-------
From Internet :
if your site has a dumb mailer try       |  for a smart mailer try
SH941727%CCNYVME.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU  |  SH941727@CCNYVME.BITNET
Today's Quote :
   9 Lives tastes better than Dinty Moore's Beef Stew.

jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK) (10/09/90)

In article <90279.164521L98CC@CUNYVM.BITNET> <SH941727%CCNYVME.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU> writes:

>Which book is the definte reference to C++ language that is comprehensive
>enough to derive a compiler from?

None, which is at least in part why there is a language standardization 
effort going on.

However, the book that is by far the closest to meeting these goals is:

The Annotated C++ Reference Manual
Ellis & Stroustrup
Addison-Wesley 1990
ISBN 0-201-51459-1

Serious compiler implementers look at this manual, compare their implementation
against other C++ compilers -- particularly the latest cfront implementation, 
check to see whether well known libraries and programs compile and execute 
correctly when compiled by their compiler, compare their implementation against 
the ANSI-C specs as a secondary reference, subordinate to the above mentioned
manual, and join the language standardization committee to keep abreast of
developments and areas of disagreement....

Good Luck!

[PS: Not a compiler implementor, but I know some people who are trying :-]