zougas@me.utoronto.ca ("Athanasios(Tom) Zougas") (10/09/90)
I've seen two techniques for emulating Smalltalk-like collection classes. In one, the contents are pointed to by a 'void *'. In the other, a bunch of defines are used to make the contents pointed to by the specific type pointer. What are the netters' comments on these? I prefer the former myself, since I don't have to mess around with defines, which can make debugging difficult. Tom. p.s. I know this will be moot once 'templates' come into existence. -- I can be reached at... zougas@me.utoronto.ca || zougas@me.toronto.edu || ...!utai!me!zougas