kevin@loki.une.oz.au (Kevin Pollard) (06/24/91)
Can someone tell me if it's worth upgading from TurboC 2.0 to Borland C++ I have written, and am continually upgrading, large C programs - integrated business packages. In the next six months I do NOT intend to modify the packages to work under windows, nor do I intend to learn C++ But, from what I can gather, it may be worth upgrading to BC++ to take advantage of the improvements made to non-objective C, and the improved development environment. Am I correct? and if so what are the improvements to the development environment - given that I will not be using C++ for a while, just C Or is there anything else better than BC++? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Aard-vark a very difficult word which you don't need to know.' ---------------------------------------- The Oxfod Simplified Dictionary.