[net.sf-lovers] V on TV

markb (05/09/83)

Relay-Version:version B 3/9/83; site harpo.UUCP
Posting-Version:version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site sdcrdcf.UUCP
Message-ID:<239@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date:Mon, 9-May-83 09:57:26 EDT
Organization:System Development Corporation--a Burroughs Company

Speaking of stealing water from the earth, would it not be much more
practical to just steal the rings of saturn.

1) No need to drag it up from a gravity well.

2) No need for tanks, just haul away the ice.

3) There is a lot more water there then on earth.

4) No hostile natives to object. We might, but would be at a
	  great disadvantage in trying to stop them.

					Mark Biggar
					...decvax!trw-unix!sdcrdcf!markb

mike (05/11/83)

	Being one who tries to see all sides of an issue,
	I thought about "V" trying to come up with a way
	to like it.  I finally came across an idea which
	I think allows me to have some respect for it.
	If you view the show strictly as a suspension of
	reality and science, rather than an extension
	thereof, it begins to make some sense.  For example,
	when you watch Superman you don't groan when he
	spins the Earth the other way to give Lois a second
	chance.  You've suspended your requirements for the
	Man of Steel to obey currently understood laws of
	Nature. (If you're is a real die hard, I suppose you
	do groan, or try to rationalize the phenomena in some
	way).  

	The writers of "V" made it quite clear in the credits
	and their advertizing that the whole concept was
	decidedly allegorical.  Perhaps their constant violations
	of "common sense" seemed just plausible enough to be
	interpreted as attempts at reality, rather than fantasy.
	Or maybe the manner in which bogus things occured
	was not quite "fantastic" enough to convince us that
	we should let go of physics and biology, and concentrate
	on psychology and morality.

	It seemed to me that the director took care during the
	scenes where humanane values were being degraded, and
	glossed over the action and adventure aspects.  The filming
	(jolting cuts to various profile shots) during the scene
	where the son who joined the Visitors youth gang phones
	headquarters to find that he has been betrayed (lied to)
	was particularly effective.

	Well, sorry for the diatribe.  Just thought that viewed
	from certain angles, the show had merit.

	Mike Williams
	UUCP: randvax!sdcrdcf!mike
	      burdvax!sdcrdcf!mike
	      ucla-vax!sdcrdcf!mike
	      cbosgd!sdcrdcf!mike
	      ihnss!sdcrdcf!mike

seth (05/12/83)

#R:ccvaxa:22100001:hp-cvd:10300008:000:458
hp-cvd!seth    May  9 11:01:00 1983

I'd like to put my 2 cents in on this one.

I gave up on V in the middle of the second part and logged into
my system and read news.  News was more entertaining.

I'm told that the aliens came here to eat us.  Wasn't this plot
better done, or at least more compactly done, on a Twilight Zone
20 years ago?  I vaguely recall the episode, but I think that it
was based on Damon Knight's "To Serve Man".

--Seth Alford, [hplabs!hp-pcd!]hp-cvd!seth, Corvallis OR

hoyme@umn-cs.UUCP (06/06/83)

#R:ccvaxa:22100001:umn-cs:2200001:000:792
umn-cs!hoyme    May  4 14:27:00 1983

   I thought that the V pilot was one of the more promising SF pilots
in recent years.  I, too, thought that the reference to a meteor in our
distant past was weak, however, that kind of innacuracy must be expected
from a 'mainstream' source.  For once we have a post 'Star Wars' SF show
without some character that is cute and short.  It is an undisguised parallel
of Nazi Germany, but that story is worth repeating (as long as they don't get
preachy al la Quincy).  The effects were very acceptable  (I liked the
effect when Diana ate the rat....ummmm  good).
   Now let's wait and see if the pressures of a normal budget and
weekly shooting schedule will ruin the writing and the effects.  Good SF
is more expensive than "Three's Company".


      Ken Hoyme
      University of Minnesota