[comp.lang.c] Softbound versus 3-Ring Manuals

jpdres10@usl-pc.UUCP (Green Eric Lee) (10/16/87)

Distribution:

Keywords:

Summary:

Expires:

Followup-To:


In message <9708@brl-adm.ARPA>, RMANGALD%CLARKU.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU says:
>        First, the argument that 3-ring manuals are easy to pirate
>does not hold water when one considers that Xerox-proof paper and
>ink are readily available, I believe, at reasonable prices.

I investigated that option for a program I published. The problem is
that basically, you can't read the darned stuff! Light blue ink, for
example, is currently uncopyable. And, red paper makes current copy
machines show an all-black image. In either case, people with marginal
eyesight, like me, have a helluva time reading it. You see, this works
because of contrast between paper and ink. If it's low enough, then
the copy machine can't tell the different between the two.
Unfortunately, that also is very hard on the eyes.

--
Eric Green  elg@usl.CSNET       from BEYOND nowhere:
{ihnp4,cbosgd}!killer!elg,      P.O. Box 92191, Lafayette, LA 70509
{ut-sally,killer}!usl!elg     "there's someone in my head, but it's not me..."

jeffh@hpubvwa (10/28/87)

So why are you so conserned about a manual copy!   

Seems like a bunk note to me...