FAUST%MIT-OZ@sri-unix.UUCP (07/01/83)
From: Gregory Faust <FAUST@MIT-OZ> I went to see Twilight Zone: The Movie on opening night here in Boston. In general I liked it, although I would not label it stupendous. After I say the movie, I saw a review of it on TV by Siskel and Ebert (sp?). I agree with the major observation that they made, but disagree with the conclusion. Namely, I agree that the first two vignettes are not as "entertaining" as the last two. From this they conclude that the movie was not up to par because "with all that Twilight Zone tradition, you would expect that they could come up with four good episodes". The problem here is that while the first two were slightly less entertaining, it is hard to say they were not as "good". Especially given that the first two are more in the TZ tradition. They both deal more with human nature and the fairness of bizarre twists of fate as did most of the TV episodes. The last two vignettes have the viewer more on the eadge of their seat and are less predictable, but draw their strength more from special effects than on insights into human nature. In addition to the four vignettes their is also a small beginning and ending sequence featuring Dan Akroyd that is fairly amusing. Since I don't want to discuss plot (because of spoilers), I will end by giving my ratings of the four vignettes separately and then of the movie as a whole based on a system of 1-5: (4, 3, 5, 4) and 4 as a whole. As an aside, it is interesting that the second vignette was the one directed by Spielberg and was the least good, although it is the one that is arguably the most TZ-like. Greg