ray@micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn) (02/17/88)
In article <1186@cooper.cooper.EDU> gene@cooper.cooper.EDU (Gene (the Spook)) writes: >.... > (ptr) p1 = (ptr) p0 + (int) d > >Simply, add an integer displacement to a pointer, and you'll get another >pointer. With a little algebra, solve for 'd'. You'll get..... Here we have a classic example of the "=" instead of "==" user!!! "Solve for"?? In an *assignment statement*?? Sorry Gene, this is not meant as an attack on you, only to underscore my scorn for those who say the "=" vs "==" thing is not a problem!! Ray Dunn. ..philabs!micomvax!ray
gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) (02/19/88)
In article <908@micomvax.UUCP> ray@micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn) writes: -In article <1186@cooper.cooper.EDU> gene@cooper.cooper.EDU (Gene (the Spook)) writes: -> (ptr) p1 = (ptr) p0 + (int) d -"Solve for"?? In an *assignment statement*?? ... -scorn for those who say the "=" vs "==" thing is not a problem!! If you think that is a C assignment statement, you're illiterate in C. I suppose in that case it IS a problem for you, but so what?