knudsen@ihlpl.ATT.COM (Knudsen) (10/15/88)
In article <6945@cdis-1.uucp>, tanner@cdis-1.uucp (Dr. T. Andrews) writes: > It is also possible that compiler writers will get the "for" loop > handling wrong. It is unwise to depend on "for" loops in portable > code. Use a "while" loop instead. Could you elaborate more on what kind of errors are most likely in compiling for loops? In testing? Incrementing? I for one can't see converting all for's to while's in a piece of code. Believe me, I've worked for years with a buggy compiler and I haven't seen it hose up a for loop yet, other than its usual problems with testing expr != 0. -- Mike Knudsen Bell Labs(AT&T) att!ihlpl!knudsen "Lawyers are like handguns and nuclear bombs. Nobody likes them, but the other guy's got one, so I better get one too."