misu_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (What`s in a name?) (03/13/90)
In article <775@s5.Morgan.COM> amull@Morgan.COM (Andrew P. Mullhaupt) writes: >This stuff doesn't belong in comp.lang.pascal. It goes in comp.lang.c, >right(?). The fistfight over bill wolfe's complaints about C should >stay in comp.lang.c. If anyone wants to complain about Pascal, then No. People who want to discuss C can do so in comp.lang.c. The fistfight over Bill Wolfe, and his comments can go into comp.lang.jihad. I imagine that these other groups would like to see a number of threads piped into said new newsgroup as well... Anybody want to take this one seriously? --mike -- Mic3hael Sullivan, Society for the Incurably Pompous -*-*-*-*- I'd hate to write a requiem and then not die. -- Jean Cardinale
timk@xenitec.on.ca (Tim Kuehn) (03/13/90)
In article <5752@ur-cc.UUCP> misu_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (What`s in a name?) writes: >In article <775@s5.Morgan.COM> amull@Morgan.COM (Andrew P. Mullhaupt) writes: >>This stuff doesn't belong in comp.lang.pascal. It goes in comp.lang.c, >>right(?). The fistfight over bill wolfe's complaints about C should >>stay in comp.lang.c. If anyone wants to complain about Pascal, then >No. People who want to discuss C can do so in comp.lang.c. The fistfight >over Bill Wolfe, and his comments can go into comp.lang.jihad. I imagine >that these other groups would like to see a number of threads piped into >said new newsgroup as well... Anybody want to take this one seriously? How about: For potential news.groups: comp.lang.bill.wolf.lang.soapbox.nobody.listening comp.misc.idiocy idiots.idiocy flame.flame flame.bill.wolf flame.C.too.while.we.are.at.it comp.lang.if.it.is.not.ada.it.can.not.possibly.work comp.lang.if.it.is.ada.it.will.never.fail this.is.so.stupid.it.does.not.even.deserve.a.name comp.lang.good.grief.! Alternate piping destinations include: /dev/null /dev/stupid /dev/nerds /dev/jihad /dev/nuke'em /dev/flame/C /dev/flame/bwolf .....you get the idea.... (no :=)'s here) Anybody think of any other places to put this non-discussion so it's where it REALLY belongs? (*sheesh!* maybe we should fill the postmaster of hubcap's with complaints about "mr." wolf. Maybe getting his Usenet access pulled, or at least confine his posting range to local / state boundaries will save net.bandwidth for more productive activities.) +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Timothy D. Kuehn timk@xenitec.on.ca | |TDK Consulting Services !watmath!xenitec!timk | |871 Victoria St. North, Suite 217A | |Kitchener, Ontario, Canada N2B 3S4 (519)-741-3623 | |DOS/Xenix - SW/HW. uC, uP, DBMS. Quality SW Guaranteed | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 ) (03/13/90)
> Anybody think of any other places to put this non-discussion so it's > where it REALLY belongs? It should be in comp.lang.misc, but Ted Holden keeps posting to group lists like comp.lang.ada,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.c, and then directing the followups to comp.lang.c. Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu
lws@comm.WANG.COM (Lyle Seaman) (03/22/90)
This discussion really belongs in an already existing group: alt.religion.computers which is where I'm going now. -- Lyle Wang lws@comm.wang.com 508 967 2322 Lowell, MA, USA uunet!comm.wang.com!lws