shore@mtxinu.COM (Melinda Shore) (04/11/90)
In article <79kla@physc1.byu.edu> someone writes: >My understanding of libraries under unix is somewhat limited, but I haven't >seen any advantage to using libraries there. However, with MSC 5.1 [ ... ] >Under unix it seems that everything is linked in every time. Need anyone say more? -- Melinda Shore shore@mtxinu.com mt Xinu ..!uunet!mtxinu.com!shore
jmann@bigbootay.sw.stratus.com (Jim Mann) (04/11/90)
Sounds to me that it's more of an argument for comp.lang.c.unix.
gwollman@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU (Garrett A Wollman) (04/11/90)
In article <1193@mtxinu.UUCP> shore@mtxinu.com (Melinda Shore) writes: >In article <79kla@physc1.byu.edu> someone writes: >>My understanding of libraries under unix is somewhat limited, but I haven't >>seen any advantage to using libraries there. However, with MSC 5.1 [ ... ] >>Under unix it seems that everything is linked in every time. > >Need anyone say more? Perhaps we need a comp.lang.c.unix, too. -GAWollman "(-::-)" (comp.lang.c != comp.unix.questions) -- "All societies are based on rules to protect pregnant women and children. . . . As racial survival is the only universal morality, no other bases is possible." - Lazarus Long [RAH, _TEFL_] ---------------Hopkins doesn't *want* my opinions------------------------