alan@cave.arc.nasa.gov (Alan Steiner x45347) (12/14/90)
Three questions: 1) Does the X/Open standard for C endorse ANSI C fully, or does X/Open's standard differ? 2) Does Sun C vers. 4.1 comply with the X/Open standard? 3) Does Sun C vers. 4.1 comply with ANSI C? (It doesn't support function protyping, or the new style of function defintion, which I thought were part of ANSI C.) Thanks very much... Alan alan@cave.arc.nasa.gov
kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley ) (12/14/90)
In article <1990Dec13.234732.29321@nas.nasa.gov> alan@cave.arc.nasa.gov.UUCP (Alan Steiner x45347) writes: > >3) Does Sun C vers. 4.1 comply with ANSI C? (It doesn't support > function protyping, or the new style of function defintion, which > I thought were part of ANSI C.) > According to our on-site Sun Support guy (Greg Earle), neither Suns bundled C (4.1) nor their unbundled C 1.0 comply with the ANSI standard. -- Kaleb Keithley Jet Propulsion Labs kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov Offensive quote coming soon to a .signature file near you.