dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave P. Schaumann) (03/02/91)
In article <1991Mar1.103608@IASTATE.EDU> john@IASTATE.EDU (Hascall John Paul) writes: > >#define FOO 4 >typedef struct { > char f_thing; > int f_thang[FOO]; >} Foo; (or FooType, or fooType) >Foo foo; I hope you don't do this on any code I ever have to look at. Names that differ only by the case of the letters are way too close, IMHO, even if they are related. That aside, I agree there should be some kind of C style standard (or guideline, if you like), which would set forth some naming conventions and the like, and which would also protect these conventions from being used for something else. -- Dave Schaumann dave@cs.arizona.edu 'Dog Gang'! Where do they get off calling us the 'Dog Gang'? I'm beginning to think the party's over. I'm beginning to think maybe we don't need a dog. Or maybe we need a *new* dog. Or maybe we need a *cat*! - Amazing Stories