djp@central.cis.upenn.edu (David Phillips) (06/13/91)
Our department has decided to switch from Pascal to C as the intro programming language. If anyone has taught this before and has any advice or warnings (other than not to try), please send them on. Thanks. djp ************************************************************************ David Phillips University of Pennsylvania djp@central.cis.upenn.edu
darwinl@alliance.uucp (Darwin Ling) (06/15/91)
As a student before, one thing I hate the most when I first learn C is that the weak type checking "feature" it has. It is especially bad as my first labguage is Pascal. So, if possible , get the ANSI C instead of the other one (like the one available on BSD Unix 4.2{3}, or whatever..} I.E. get one with a stronger type checking feature. It would ease the efforts a lot in leanring a new programming language like C. One thing, you may be aware of it already, is that , C is not intended for any educational purposes like Pascal's. So, it got a lot of stuff there which is to allow programmer to get around things . ------------------------------------------------------------------ Darwin Ling Alliance Technologies , Inc Advanced Development group uunet : uunet!alliance!darwinl ------------------------------------------------------------------
ditolla@itnsg1.cineca.it (Francesco Di Tolla) (06/20/91)
It's good! If the first language you learn is hard, then you 'll learn other languages in a short time; if you learn C or Pascal, you'll be able to read programs written in Fortran or Basic. C is a bit harder then Pascal..., so the student also in other laguages 'll program better then if hi started with the other. Force them to write subroutines also for tasks for which they already exists (ex. strcpy.....). As reference manual the K.R. is good but slow, it explains must important features only after a long introduction, so the student 'll have problems in understanding things like 'visibility' and 'lifetime' of variables, or the utility of pointers..., very good from this point of view are the original manuals of Microsoft C (I learned much more on them, in the version 4.0). In a first course I won't talk about object oriented programming. Don't make applications to graphics, they are not standard F.
chapmans@motcid.UUCP (Simon ( Grouchy Babes ) Chapman) (06/20/91)
In article <1991Jun19.172436.14898@itnsg1.cineca.it> ditolla@itnsg1.cineca.it (Francesco Di Tolla) writes: >It's good! >If the first language you learn is hard, then you 'll learn other >languages in a short time; >if you learn C or Pascal, you'll be able to read programs written >in Fortran or Basic. >C is a bit harder then Pascal..., so the student also in other >laguages 'll program better then if hi started with the other. I can't believe that I just read this. Not a sign of `IMHO' anywhere. If you make students learn a language that you _know_ is `hard', are you sure you haven't put them off learning another language forever ? I'm not overly sold on the idea of giving anyone K & R as a learning exercise either. I regularly recommend Stephen Kochan's C books as good beginning C books. IMHO. ;-) Flame off. Where's the vodka. +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Simon Chapman Motorola CID. UK. "Go UCD Aggies !!" | | UUCP : ...uunet!motcid!pyramid!chapmans | | Internet : motcid!pyramid!chapmans@uunet.uu.net | | Phone : +44 793 545425 (international) (0793) 545425 (domestic) | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
ron@eatdust (Ron Schweikert) (06/21/91)
In article <7363@maize.UUCP> chapmans@motcid.UUCP (Simon ( Grouchy Babes ) Chapman) writes: >In article <1991Jun19.172436.14898@itnsg1.cineca.it> ditolla@itnsg1.cineca.it (Francesco Di Tolla) writes: >>It's good! >>If the first language you learn is hard, then you 'll learn other >>languages in a short time; stuff deleted.. >I can't believe that I just read this. Not a sign of `IMHO' >anywhere. If you make students learn a language that you _know_ >is `hard', are you sure you haven't put them off learning >another language forever ? Well, IMHO :-), C is okay as a starter (and obviously for advanced work!) The key is to use it's structured character and good support of top-down program design (IMHO). You don't get into ptrs to matrices of arrays of ptrs (:-) right off the bat anyway! Don't use the "hard" parts of the language. No flames please, I know that you can write really "bad" C, but just because a language has power and flexibility doesn't mean you have to use it or teach it (IMHO). I think C is 'hard ' because people haven't learned the basics (IMHO). (ok, no more kidding with IMHO). I took one Pascal class, never did anything outside of the class (Adult Continuing Education, so it wasn't really "in-depth") and then took C. We did a lot of the "simple" stuff and learned good programming style, *then* worked into the more challenging stuff. The key is the teacher and the curriculum, not the language (IMHO) :-)
cosper@seq.uncwil.edu (Kit Cosper) (06/21/91)
chapmans@motcid.UUCP (Simon ( Grouchy Babes ) Chapman) writes: [deleted stuff] >I'm not overly sold on the idea of giving anyone K & R as a >learning exercise either. I regularly recommend Stephen Kochan's >C books as good beginning C books. I just go through the first semester of C and had a blast. We used Kochan's _Programming in C_, which I found to be a most friendly text for the neophyte programmer. I also purchased K&R as a reference ( it's also used in the second semester to follow up after Kochan ) and, aside from some lib functions at the end of the semester I didn't get much mileage this go 'round. Not that it isn't a good book, IMHO it's excellent, just a little advanced for the beginner. At this university C is now "the" intro language. I had BASIC years ago (~10) and had no problems with taking C and FORTRAN concurrently. Actually, I found C easier than FORTRAN. >IMHO. ;-) Flame off. Where's the vodka. Not here! I'm whiskey man > +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Simon Chapman Motorola CID. UK. "Go UCD Aggies !!" | > | UUCP : ...uunet!motcid!pyramid!chapmans | > | Internet : motcid!pyramid!chapmans@uunet.uu.net | > | Phone : +44 793 545425 (international) (0793) 545425 (domestic) | > +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Kit -- Kit Cosper cosper@seq.uncwil.edu Donations of witty or thoughtful comments appreciated
s64421@zeus.usq.EDU.AU (house ron) (06/24/91)
cosper@seq.uncwil.edu (Kit Cosper) writes: > I just go through the first semester of C and had a blast. > We used Kochan's _Programming in C_, which I found to be > a most friendly text for the neophyte programmer. I also >.... > At this university C is now "the" intro language. I had BASIC > years ago (~10) and had no problems with taking C and FORTRAN > concurrently. Actually, I found C easier than FORTRAN. Then you're not a neophyte programmer, are you? When you learn you very first language, you master all sorts of _concepts_ which you never need learn again. -- Regards, Ron House. (s64421@zeus.usq.edu.au) (By post: Info Tech, U.C.S.Q. Toowoomba. Australia. 4350)