go@orstcs.UUCP (04/06/87)
I have an associate who wants to do some "light-duty" control programming in Pascal for an old Z80 machine he has lying around. It runs CP/M 2.2. Are there any suggestions from the crowd regarding what would be a good choice here? I know about DRI's Pascal MT+. I have used it and won't recommend that. Does Turbo-pascal still exist for cp/m? Direct all responses to me by mail, please. Thanks for the help. ...!hplabs!!hp-pcd!orstcs!go (Gary Oliver)
go@hplabs.hp.COM (04/07/87)
I have an associate that wants to do some "light-duty" control programming in Pascal for an old Z80 machine he has lying around. It runs CP/M 2.2. Are there any suggestions from the crowd regarding what would be a good choice here? I know about DRI's Pascal MT+. I have used it and won't recommend that. Does Turbo-pascal still exist for cp/m? Direct all responses to me by mail, please. Thanks for the help. ...!hplabs!!hp-pcd!orstcs!go (Gary Oliver)
sdh@inuxm.UUCP (04/08/87)
> > > I have an associate who wants to do some "light-duty" control > programming in Pascal for an old Z80 machine he has lying around. > It runs CP/M 2.2. Are there any suggestions from the crowd regarding > what would be a good choice here? I know about DRI's Pascal MT+. > I have used it and won't recommend that. Does Turbo-pascal still > exist for cp/m? > > Direct all responses to me by mail, please. Thanks for the help. > ...!hplabs!!hp-pcd!orstcs!go (Gary Oliver) Turbo Pascal is the premier choice, in my opinion. I have two C compilers, a Basic interpreter/compiler, and other stuff. Turbo Pascal is what I use exclusively. Why? SPEED! I don't have to exit the editor, start the compiler, run the assembler, then the linker, then pop back in the editor to fix a bug. It's all there in one integrated environment. Two months ago I finally bought a clone of an IBM AT. So, the CP/M system just sits there. Anyway, the first program I got for my AT was Turbo Pascal. Stephen Hoskins AT&T Consumer Electronics Laboratories Indianapolis, Indiana