[sci.research] <<< I.S. SURVEY II >>>

) (07/19/90)

***************************************************************************
I N F O R M A T I O N   S Y S T E M S   S U R V E Y  - Student Research
***************************************************************************
The response to this survey has been great! I appreciate all who took the
time to respond. I am posting this again as I need a larger number of 
responses to go by for statistical purposes. (At least 30 in a sample 
to model a population, etc.)  Thank you. :-)
         
Please answer these questions with an X by YES or NO. E-mail to 
                                           ddahmer@uceng.uc.edu
---------
YES | NO
--------- 
|   |   |1) Have you ever needed specific propriatory or non-propriatory  
|   |   |   info in order to solve a problem in your company whether it be for
|   |   |   research, testing, development, investments, production, marketing?
|   |   |   (Info that you cannot access with your knowledge and resources.)
|   |   |2) Do you consistantly need to do research to find info outside of
|   |   |   your company?
|   |   |3) Do you feel you have adequate access to info you need from
|   |   |   outside of your company?
|   |   |4) Are you able to find the specific info in a short amount of time
|   |   |   and at a low cost to you?
==============================================================================
COMMENTS:



==============================================================================
	Thanks for answering!    My research thanks you.
				-Dave
				ddahmer@uceng.uc.edu
				dahmer@larry4.larry.uc.edu

wvenable@spam.ua.oz (Bill Venables) (07/20/90)

In article <5533@uceng.UC.EDU> ddahmer@uceng.UC.EDU (Hello World!) writes:
>... I am posting this again as I need a larger number of responses to
>go by for statistical purposes. (At least 30 in a sample to model a
>population, etc.)  ...

I feel obliged to sound a warning of the dangers of drawing inferences
from self-selected rather than random samples.  Sample size by itself
is no safeguard against wildy erroneous conclusions.

-- 
  Bill Venables, Dept. Statistics,        | Email:   wvenable@spam.ua.oz.au
  Univ. of Adelaide,  South Australia.    | Phone:           +61 8 228 5412

dgoudge@nmsu.edu (Darrell Goudge) (07/28/90)

In article <345@spam.ua.oz> wvenable@spam.ua.oz (Bill Venables) writes:
>In article <5533@uceng.UC.EDU> ddahmer@uceng.UC.EDU (Hello World!) writes:
>>... I am posting this again as I need a larger number of responses to
>>go by for statistical purposes. (At least 30 in a sample to model a
>>population, etc.)  ...
>
>I feel obliged to sound a warning of the dangers of drawing inferences
>from self-selected rather than random samples.  Sample size by itself
>is no safeguard against wildy erroneous conclusions.
>
>-- 

I think the caution of using a convenience sample especially collection 
for the express purpose of increasing power is well founded, unless 
the sampling frame is the population of interest.  In this case the
population of interest could be the individuals who read this group and 
wish to participate in this survey.

Darrell Goudge
Marketing Department
New Mexico State University
Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003