eli@bbn.com (Steve Elias) (03/25/88)
In article <238@mruxd.UUCP> lag@mruxd.UUCP ( L Clifford) writes:
!! if nuclear energy were an "energy consumer" (it's not), it
!! would be a superb solution to thermal runaway! we could
!! just build lots of reactors -- they would be net energy consumers
!! and chill out the planet.
!
!Quite so. I should have said, "net useful energy consumer", "useful"
!referring to electricity and to the other forms of energy useful,
well. thanks for your arguments on why nuclear power could
be a net waste of energy. i apologize that my literacy level
isn't up to your standards, Larry. i don't apologize for my
minimal use of upper case letters though.
!but e.e. cummings here would rather waste time by pointing
!out (with devastating insight) that fissioning
!U235 and its cousins is an exothermic process.
get lost with the ee cummings bullshit. i type in lower case
because my left shift finger is mangled. so fuck off. eli@bbn.com (Steve Elias) (03/25/88)
apologies for the poor mood so evident in that last posting. the bullshit this company has been heaving has been getting to me. and i don't like taking shit because of they way i type... it has been interesting rapping with you folks over the last few months. my next job may not have usenet access, but i'll try to keep in touch somehow...