[sci.lang] Sperber & Wilson on Relevance: BBS Multiple Book Review

harnad@mind.UUCP (03/12/87)

The following is the abstract of the precis of a book on which BBS
[Behavioral and Brain Sciences -- An international, interdisciplinary
Journal of Open Peer Commentary, published by Cambridge University Press]
invites self-nominations by potential book-reviewers. The precis will
be published jointly with multiple book reviews.

(Please note that the editorial office must exercise selectivity among the
nominations received so as to ensure a strong and balanced cross-specialty
spectrum of eligible commentators. The procedure is explained after
the abstract.)

-----
		RELEVANCE:  COMMUNICATION AND COGNITION

	by:     Dan Sperber (Ethnology, U. Paris) and
	        Deirdre Wilson (Psychology, U. College London)

  Abstract of Precis:

  In "Relevance: Communication and Cognition," we outline a new
  approach to the study of human communication based on a general view
  of human cognition. Attention and cognitive processes, we argue,
  automatically turn toward information that seems relevant, i.e.,
  capable of yielding cognitive effects -- the more, and the more
  economically, the better. We analyze the nature of cognitive effects
  and the inferential processes by which they are derived.

  Communication can be achieved by two different means: by encoding
  and decoding messages or by providing evidence for an intended
  inference about the communicator's informative intention. Verbal
  communication, we argue, exploits both types of process. The
  linguistic meaning of an utterance, recovered by specialized
  decoding processes, serves as the input to unspecialized central
  inferential processes by which the speaker's intentions are
  recognized.

  Fundamental to our account of inferential communication is the fact
  that to communicate is to claim someone's attention and hence to
  imply that the information communicated is relevant. This idea, that
  communicated information comes with a guarantee of relevance, we
  call the "principle of relevance." We show that every utterance has
  at most a single interpretation consistent with this principle,
  which is thus enough on its own to account for the interaction of
  linguistic meaning and contextual factors in disambiguation,
  reference assignment, the recovery of implicatures, the
  interpretation of metaphor and irony, the recovery of illocutionary
  force, and other linguistically underdetermined aspects of utterance
  interpretation.

-----

This is an experiment in using the Net to find eligible commentators
for articles (and reviewers for books) in the Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal of
"open peer commentary," published by Cambridge University Press, with
its editorial office in Princeton NJ.

The journal publishes important and controversial interdisciplinary
articles in psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, cognitive science,
artificial intelligence, linguistics and philosophy. Articles are
rigorously refereed and, if accepted, are circulated to a large number
of potential commentators around the world in the various specialties
on which the article impinges. Their 1000-word commentaries are then
co-published with the target article as well as the author's response
to each. The commentaries consist of analyses, elaborations,
complementary and supplementary data and theory, criticisms and
cross-specialty syntheses.

Commentators are selected by the following means: (1) BBS maintains a
computerized file of over 3000 BBS Associates; the size of this group
is increased annually as authors, referees, commentators and nominees
of current Associates become eligible to become Associates. Many
commentators are selected from this list. (2) The BBS editorial office
does informal as well as formal computerized literature searches on
the topic of the target articles to find additional potential commentators
from across specialties and around the world who are not yet BBS Associates.
(3) The referees recommend potential commentators. (4) The author recommends
potential commentators.

We now propose to add the following source for selecting potential
commentators: The abstract of the target article will be posted in the
relevant newsgroups on the net. Eligible individuals who judge that they
would have a relevant commentary to contribute should contact the editor at
the e-mail address indicated at the bottom of this message, or should
write by normal mail to:

			Stevan Harnad
			Editor
			Behavioral and Brain Sciences
			20 Nassau Street, Room 240
			Princeton NJ 08542
			(phone: 609-921-7771)

"Eligibility" usually means being an academically trained professional
contributor to one of the disciplines mentioned earlier, or to related
academic disciplines. The letter should indicate the candidate's
general qualifications as well as their basis for wishing to serve as
commentator for the particular target article in question. It is
preferable also to enclose a Curriculum Vitae. (This self-nomination
format may also be used by those who wish to become BBS Associates,
but they must also specify a current Associate who knows their work
and is prepared to nominate them; where no current Associate is known
by the candidate, the editorial office will send the Vita to
approporiate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to
nominate the candidate.)

BBS has rapidly become a widely read read and highly influential forum in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. A recent recalculation of BBS's
"impact factor" (ratio of citations to number of articles) in the
American Psychologist [41(3) 1986] reports that already in its fifth year of
publication (1982) BBS's impact factor had risen to become the highest of
all psychology journals indexed as well as 3rd highest of all 1300 journals
indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index and 50th of all 3900 journals
indexed in the Science Citation index, which indexes all the scientific
disciplines.

Potential commentators should send their names, addresses, a description of
their general qualifications and their basis for seeking to comment on
this target article in particular to the address indicated earlier or
to the following e-mail address:

{bellcore, psuvax1, seismo, rutgers, packard}  !princeton!mind!harnad
harnad%mind@princeton.csnet    harnad@princeton.ARPA

[Subscription information is available from Harry Florentine at
Cambridge University Press:  800-221-4512]
-- 

Stevan Harnad                                  (609) - 921 7771
{bellcore, psuvax1, seismo, rutgers, packard}  !princeton!mind!harnad
harnad%mind@princeton.csnet           harnad@princeton.ARPA