[sci.lang] Biological classifications and AI

hermit@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (William R. Ward) (01/19/89)

To be brief:

The difference between a penguin and a robin, or for that matter, a human
being, is a qualitative one.  The robin is "more of a bird" by some people's
definitions, and conceivably the penguin could be classified along with
humans in that both walk on two legs on land and cannot fly (barring such
tricks such as jumping, hanggliding, or the Space Shuttle).  Using quantitative
definitions for things such as "bird," "mammal," et al., is convenient for
quick and easy reference, but does not describe very well things classified
into said definitions.

Not being an expert on AI systems, I cannot hazard a guess toward an algorithm
for processing the image of a penguin.  I can only project my ideas about
biological classifications.  I would like to say, however, that any form of
pattern matching system should not deal with details such as length of wings
as opposed to length of legs, or whatever, but instead with the image as a
whole, comparing it to previously stored images and imagining changes needed
to change the perceived image into one it knows already.
--
If creative thoughts could cause sparks, dynamite could safely be stored in this
establishment.

William R. Ward <hermit@ucscb.ucsc.edu>