[net.sf-lovers] The Probability Broach

APPLE%MIT-MC@sri-unix.UUCP (05/25/84)

From:  James A. Cox <APPLE @ MIT-MC>

After seeing "The Probability Broach" by L. Neil Smith recommended as
an example of libertarian SF, I ran right out to my favorite bookstore
and bought a copy.  Of course I've read a number of books with
libertarian angles, including some by Heinlein, H. Beam Piper, Lee
Correy, and even James P. Hogan but I don't think I've ever read
anything which carried laudatory blurbs from "Libertarian Review" and
"Reason" as this book does.  Unfortunately, I was disappointed by the
book, for two reasons.  First, the book makes a good many errors about
the history of the American Revolution, and to someone who knows
anything about that event, those errors are every bit as glaring as
the errors of science in "V."  Second, the book is preachy about
libertarianism.  Of course I expected that, but what I didn't expect
was that its preaching would be unconvincing!  Maybe I'm spoiled
having read persuasive libertarian arguments in Poli-Sci for the
past few years....

The premise of the book is the existence of an alternative universe in
which the United States has developed into a libertarian "North
American Confederacy."  The history of the two universes was the same
up until 1794, when in the alternative universe George Washington was
killed by Albert Gallatin during the Whisky Rebellion.  Gallatin (who
in "our" universe was an unspectacular Secretary of the Treasury in
the Jefferson administration) led the attack against the Federalists
and "their" Constitution, which was declared "null and void."  The
Articles of Confederation were reinstated and Gallatin was proclaimed
President.  Shortly thereafter he was confirmed by Congress, which
proceeded to abolish all taxes and restore seized property to the
Loyalists and Federalists.  In 1797, the Articles of Confederation
were revised, binding the United States and the states to respect the
civil and political rights of all citizens.  From that point on, the
government proceeded to gradually wither away, leaving Americans to
enjoy their blissful anarcho-capitalist paradise.

The most obvious historical error is that Gallatin could not have been
"proclaimed" President after the Articles of Confederation were
reinstated, because THERE WAS NO SUCH OFFICE UNDER THE ARTICLES OF
CONFEDERATION!  It got worse from that point on.  Smith's made-up
history has all sorts of unlikely people being elected president
through history, including Albert Jay Nock, H.L. Mencken, and Ayn Rand
(imagine the oh-so-dignified Ms. Rand out "stumping," eating ethnic
dishes and making speeches!).

The libertarianism is, as I said, not very convincing.  The basic plot
has a few concerned individuals trying to stop a "Federalist"
conspiracy to restore the Constitution and do other evil things to the
free people of the Confederation.  (It's not very difficult to spot
the Federalists because they all wear insignia of an eye-in-a-pyramid
[you know, like on the back of a one dollar bill]).  In one scene, the
main character has just captured an assasin, sent to kill him by the
number one baddie.  It turns out that Confederacy "custom" prohibits
the guy from threatening the assasin in order to make him reveal the
name of his boss.  Come on!  That sounds like they let Earl Warren
write the criminal rules in both universes.  In MY libertarian
paradise, that man just forfeited ALL rights by attempting murder.
Once force is used against me, I ought to have the right to respond
with whatever degree of force I deem necessary in order to insure that
those who violated my rights once cannot do so again.

The characterizations are little better.  "The Probability
Broach" reads as though L. Neil Smith neglected to make up new
characters of his own, and just appropriated ones from the "Lensman"
series of another Smith: E.E. "Doc".  Only the plot is of any
rudimentary interest; I was interested in whether Smith let the
Federalists win in the end--but the book's faults almost had me
turning to the last chapter directly, skipping the rest.

All in all, I do not recommend the book.

 - James Cox