[sci.math] Yet Another Bunch of Replies about Primes

rich@jvncf.csc.org..csc.org (Seth I. Rich) (07/24/87)

Earlier today, I posted a list of references for research on Primeness, with
a request to E-Mail me any corrections or missing information.  Since I got
a bunch more references, I post them here too, with the same request.  Please
note that whatever our rather cranky mail program says, my address is as
follows: rich@jvncf.csc.org

New respondants: Greg Nowak, Bennet Yee, Mark Fulk, David Eppstein

There's always something about modularity tests...the ones that Carmichael
	numbers are an exception to...but there are ways to beef that up.
	(Look - I only type them...I don't try to understand them.)
There are various high-precision software packages available that would
	prove necessary for this sort of research.
Gary L. Miller, "Riemann's Hypothesis and Tests for Primality", Journal
	of Computer and System Sciences, 13, 300-317 (1976)
Shafi Goldwater and Joe Killian, "Almost All Primes Can Be Quickly Certified",
	ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, 1986, pp. 316-329
Leonard M. Adleman and Ming-Deh Huang, "Recognizing Primes in Random Polynomial
	Time", Proc. 19th ACM Symp. Theory of Computing, 1987, pp 462-469
L. M. Adleman, C. Pomerance, and R. S. Rumely, "On Distinguishing Prime Numbers
	from Composite Numbers", Annals of Math, 117, 1983, pp 173-206
Also, there's word that good stuff along this line is being done at Chicago.  I
	don't yet have any information on that topic.

I'm looking forward to hearing from you if there's anything you have to offer.
Thanks much.

- Seth I. Rich