grant@garfield.cs.mun.ca (Grant Burton) (03/21/91)
This is a 'famous' problem of Neil Robertson and P. D. Seymour. DISJOINT CONNECTING PATHS (DCP) ------------------------------- INSTANCE: A graph G = (V,E), and pairs (s1,t1), ..., (sk,tk) of V. QUESTION: Do there exist paths P1, ..., Pk of G, mutually vertex-disjoint, such that Pi joins si and ti (1 <= i <= k) ? The following is a problem I am working on, first some definitions. 1) A path Pi is specified as <v(i), a(i,1), ..., a(i,*), u(i)>, such that the sequence indicates, in the usual fashion, which edges compose the path. The vertices a(*,*) are called internal vertices of Pi. The endpoints of the path are v(i) and u(i). 2) Two paths Pi and Pj are called internally-disjoint iff their internal vertices are all mutually disjoint, formally speaking a(i,*) != a(j,*) for all a(i,*) in Pi and all a(j,*) in Pj. Note that Pi and Pj may share at most one common endpoint, so this is different than the definition of vertex-disjoint paths as in DCP. Now to define my problem. INTERNALLY DISJOINT CONNECTING PATHS (IDCP) ------------------------------------------- INSTANCE: A graph G = (V,E), and pairs (s1,t1), ..., (sk,tk) of V. QUESTION: Do there exist paths P1, ..., Pk of G, mutually internally- disjoint, such that Pi has endspoints s1 and t1 (1 <= i <= k) ? Questions: 1) These two problems are obviously different, do you agree ? 2) DCP is known to be NP-complete, and it is a subproblem of IDCP, therefore IDCP must also NP-complete, do you agree ? 3) Have you ever heard of this IDCP problem before ? 4) Any general comments on an algorithm to solve this problem ? Please e-mail your answers to me at grant@garfield.cs.mun.ca Thank You, Grant Burton Department of Computer Science Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John's, Newfoundland A1C 5S7 -- | grant@garfield.cs.mun.ca | Man said "let there be light", and there was fire. Man being lonely created | machine in the image of himself, and chaos was discovered.
foster@ted.cs.uidaho.edu (03/23/91)
In article <1991Mar20.170612.13200@garfield.cs.mun.ca> grant@garfield.cs.mun.ca (Grant Burton) writes: > >Questions: >2) DCP is known to be NP-complete, and it is a subproblem of IDCP, > therefore IDCP must also NP-complete, do you agree ? No. 2-sat is a subproblem of 3-sat, yet is not np-complete. James