grant@garfield.cs.mun.ca (Grant Burton) (03/21/91)
This is a 'famous' problem of Neil Robertson and P. D. Seymour.
DISJOINT CONNECTING PATHS (DCP)
-------------------------------
INSTANCE: A graph G = (V,E), and pairs (s1,t1), ..., (sk,tk) of V.
QUESTION: Do there exist paths P1, ..., Pk of G, mutually vertex-disjoint,
such that Pi joins si and ti (1 <= i <= k) ?
The following is a problem I am working on, first some definitions.
1) A path Pi is specified as <v(i), a(i,1), ..., a(i,*), u(i)>, such
that the sequence indicates, in the usual fashion, which edges compose
the path. The vertices a(*,*) are called internal vertices of Pi.
The endpoints of the path are v(i) and u(i).
2) Two paths Pi and Pj are called internally-disjoint iff their internal
vertices are all mutually disjoint, formally speaking
a(i,*) != a(j,*) for all a(i,*) in Pi and all a(j,*) in Pj.
Note that Pi and Pj may share at most one common endpoint, so this is
different than the definition of vertex-disjoint paths as in DCP.
Now to define my problem.
INTERNALLY DISJOINT CONNECTING PATHS (IDCP)
-------------------------------------------
INSTANCE: A graph G = (V,E), and pairs (s1,t1), ..., (sk,tk) of V.
QUESTION: Do there exist paths P1, ..., Pk of G, mutually internally-
disjoint, such that Pi has endspoints s1 and t1 (1 <= i <= k) ?
Questions:
1) These two problems are obviously different, do you agree ?
2) DCP is known to be NP-complete, and it is a subproblem of IDCP,
therefore IDCP must also NP-complete, do you agree ?
3) Have you ever heard of this IDCP problem before ?
4) Any general comments on an algorithm to solve this problem ?
Please e-mail your answers to me at grant@garfield.cs.mun.ca
Thank You,
Grant Burton
Department of Computer Science
Memorial University of Newfoundland
St. John's, Newfoundland
A1C 5S7
--
| grant@garfield.cs.mun.ca
| Man said "let there be light", and there was fire. Man being lonely created
| machine in the image of himself, and chaos was discovered.foster@ted.cs.uidaho.edu (03/23/91)
In article <1991Mar20.170612.13200@garfield.cs.mun.ca> grant@garfield.cs.mun.ca (Grant Burton) writes: > >Questions: >2) DCP is known to be NP-complete, and it is a subproblem of IDCP, > therefore IDCP must also NP-complete, do you agree ? No. 2-sat is a subproblem of 3-sat, yet is not np-complete. James