[sci.astro] Status of Astro at 2/11:00 MET

gsh7w@astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy) (12/05/90)

The outlook for getting science out of ASTRO is starting to look up.
There was an estimate on the nature of the error in the star tracker.
The star tracker is apparently more sensitive then expected, so more
stars were being seen. Last night, at 01/23:00 Mission elapsed time, a
patch was uploaded to the star tracker, and it immediatley passed its
OPCAL, which is the calibration of the star tracker. The next object
viewed was steady to 0.8 arcseconds. (The nominal value was 1.2 arc
seconds, so the star tracker was better than expected.) The star
tracker was fixed by a "patch" to the software. However, an additonal
patch intended to clear up a related problem was applied to the wrong
computer, which caused said computer to crash. This crash wiped out
the patch, the program stored in permanent memory being incorrect. The
patch had to be reloaded, and the calibration repeated, which was a
loss of about 12 hours of data. The UV instruments are proceeding
cautiously, but appears that scietific observations are being taken.
The cameras are taking data from the LMC. 

BBXRT (Broad Band X-ray Telescope) was aligned yesterday, and achieved
first light on the star Capella. There is no reason to expect that
BBXRT will not start routine scientific data. The LMC is of intense
interest to BBXRT, due to the presence of SuperNova 1987A. After the
observation of the LMC, BBXRT will be observing the Crab NEbula.

Other objects scheduled to be observed in this shift include
Betlegeuse, The Cygnus Loop, The Perseus cluster, and M92.

--
-Greg Hennessy, University of Virginia
 USPS Mail:     Astronomy Department, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475 USA
 Internet:      gsh7w@virginia.edu  
 UUCP:		...!uunet!virginia!gsh7w

jack@csccat.cs.com (Jack Hudler) (12/05/90)

In article <1990Dec4.181740.11408@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gsh7w@astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy) writes:
>There was an estimate on the nature of the error in the star tracker.
>The star tracker is apparently more sensitive then expected, so more
>stars were being seen.
Where have I heard this before! :-)
-- 
Jack 		Computer Support Corporation		Dallas,Texas 
Hudler		Internet: jack@csccat.cs.com