[net.sf-lovers] defense of "The Cold Equations"

VLSI%DEC-MARLBORO@sri-unix.UUCP (07/10/84)

From:  John Redford <VLSI at DEC-MARLBORO>

Let me put in a word in favor of "The Cold Equations" by Tom Godwin. Most SF
stories are relentlessly optimistic.  Given enough smarts, SFers believe
that they can get around any difficulty, solve any problem.  The whole point of
"The Cold Equations" is that some problems cannot be solved.  There is no way
that both the pilot and the stowaway can both land safely.  There is no way 
that the stowaway can land the shuttle.  Therefore she has to go out the 
airlock. 

Jeff Duntemann calls this an "idiot plot", a plot that only works if everyone
involved is an idiot. "Why not unbolt a chair and throw it out?", he suggests.
Well, the shuttle already had to be stripped down to make it possible for it to
land at all.  The fifty extra kilos of a stowaway was outside of its safety
margin. The idea was to set up a situation that even can-do engineers would
admit was hopeless.  The parameters of the situation could be changed to make
it even worse. The point is that these situations exist, that sometimes there
is nothing you can do.   This is a true but unpleasant moral, which is why
"The Cold Equations" is a good story.

John Redford
   --------