[sci.space] Details on the alleged FTL signals.

klaes@mtwain.dec.com (CUP/ML, MLO5-2/G1 8A, 223-3283) (01/20/89)

         The following article contains more details on Obolensky's 
    claim of FTL signals, and a rebuttal by Jim Lesurf; from the January 
    14, 1989 issue of NEW SCIENTIST:

         Alexis Obolensky, the American (United States) instrumentation
    engineer who claims to have discovered faster than light (FTL)
    signals, set up an experimental rig which consists of a wire arranged
    in a triangular circuit with a 250 volt battery at its apex and a pair
    of square metal plates designed to act as capacitors at the corners of
    the base of the triangle.  Two mercury vapor relays break the circuit
    sixty times per second at the base of the triangle near each of the
    plates.  A pair of sensing coils, linked by coaxial cables to a twin
    channel oscilloscope located up to 46 meters away, encircles the base
    wire near the relays. 

         One of the relays discharges the parallel plate capacitor, while
    the other relay remains closed.  Obolensky claims the signals can take
    two routes to the oscilloscope:  Through the nearest coax cable and on
    the base wire and the longer coax cable.  He claims the first signals
    arrived almost simultaneously and almost instantaneously along both
    routes - he claims 100 times faster than the speed of light, which is
    186,000 miles (300,000 kilometers) per second.  He claims a second
    signal then arrives, traveling at twice the speed of light. 

         Jim Lesurf, Saint Andrews University, sees two major flaws in the
    experiment:  The sensor coils do not detect current because they are
    perpendicular to the magnetic field produced - instead they detect
    electric field; the current does not necessarily stop as soon as the
    relay opens - it involves changing magnetic fields:  The parallel
    plates would act as mirrors producing electromagnetic images of the
    circuit wires.  These flaws do not represent FTL transmissions but
    changes in potential at various points in the circuit as the plates
    are charged and discharged.  He also suggests a path between the
    coaxial cables whose speed would vary with atmospheric conditions
    (experiment outside) that explains the varying measurements produced. 

         Larry Klaes