[sci.space] space news from Dec 3 AW&ST

henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) (12/17/90)

[This is the last AW&ST summary for the next 2-3 weeks, as I will be on
vacation.  The good news, though, is that I'm actually caught up even
so, since I consider a month behind to be normal.]

Hydrogen turbopump of Pratt&Whitney's alternate SSME pump assembly runs
successfully at 100% power.  P&W has a contract to demonstrate an alternative
to the current (Rocketdyne) pumps, up to and including flight certification
in 1993.  [There are, however, no specific plans to actually fly the new
pumps, or to convert the shuttle fleet to use them, even if they work well.]
P&W is about to deliver its first pump set to Stennis for tests.

The X-30 overall color scheme will be white for first flight, but once the
program starts on higher Mach numbers, it will probably revert to the natural
surface colors.  No current paints are considered capable of surviving on the
hotter sections.

Pictures of the first Titan 4 version of the Centaur -- essentially the
Centaur G-prime originally meant for the shuttle -- about to be shipped
to the Cape in preparation for use on a military payload next year.  GD
has a $1.3G contract for 15 over the next five years.  The new version is
fatter than the old Centaurs and carries about 50% more fuel.  Further
improvements are being pursued.  Modernized electronics will be more
reliable and will cut electronics parts count and weight by about 50%.
GD is also scheming a single-engine Centaur to reduce overall weight
substantially, since the Titan application does not need the higher
thrust of the current pair of engines.

[Aha, I told you so!]  NASA wants to postpone the Spacelab J shuttle mission
to 1992, giving other [US!] payloads the last one or two slots in the reduced
shuttle manifest for 1991.  Japan, naturally, wants to fly its mission as
planned.

Magellan images, in quantity.  The geologists are jumping up and down.
The current big mystery is that crater counts make the surface relatively
young, about 400Myr, while it is clear that there is very little erosion,
with successive features superimposed on each other with all details
preserved.  (Earth's land surface averages 1Gyr.)  The current guess is
that the resurfacing is due to lava flows, which are quite prominent.
It is not clear whether vulcanism is still occurring, although Magellan
images may eventually resolve this.  Another surprise is that the impact
craters seem to be mostly the same age, while the Moon and other bodies
show a wide range of ages.

Minor problems for Magellan on the horizon:  around April, thermal stresses
will be at their peak, when the electronics sections are getting more or less
continuous sunlight rather than being shaded by the antenna.  This is an
issue because Magellan's ability to reject heat is not up to spec, perhaps
due to problems with its thermal blankets.  Engineers are studying ways to
reduce heat load, possibly by shortening the hot data-playback phase of
each orbit -- this would limit mapping, but the hoped-for extended mission
could cover missed areas.

Hubble mirror board reports, blaming faulty test equipment, lack of proper
management supervision, and inadequate expertise at and oversight by NASA.
The board says NASA is half to blame, a view that "some high NASA officials"
are not at all happy about.  A possible contributing factor is that the
project was being overseen by Marshall, during its worst pre-Challenger
phase of discouraging reports of problems.  The PE optical division
successfully held off attempts to get either contractor or NASA personnel
in to assess mirror fabrication operations.

The ultimate problem was a fabrication error in the reflective null
corrector, used in mirror testing.  PE planned to certify the RNC with
great care and avoid any need for independent testing of the mirror...
but the board could not find any documentation that the RNC *was*
properly certified, and criticizes PE for not planning independent tests.

The probable problem in the RNC was that a measurement was done on the
wrong part.  It was supposed to be done on the end of a rod, visible
through a hole in an end cap, but in fact a small piece of nonreflective
coating had broken off the cap, and it seems likely that the measurement
was actually done on the shiny spot on the cap instead.  The board says
that PE missed at least three chances to catch the problem.  First,
spacing washers had to be added to the rod to make it line up; "that
in itself should have alerted people that something was different than
designers had intended".  Then, two other devices -- an inverse null
corrector and a refractive null corrector -- were also used to check
the mirror, and both indicated problems.  However, PE engineers decided
that the RNC was a certified test device and the inherently lower
precision of the two other devices invalidated their results.  A later
request from an advisory body for an independent test for gross flaws
was rejected because PE was confident that the earlier tests were right.

Adding to the problem were managerial flaws.  PE's own management did
not supervise the Optical Operations Division properly.  NASA project
management lacked the expertise to evaluate the optical work.  PE's
best people were not involved in the Hubble mirror at all.  NASA did
not take the initiative to examine the fabrication process.  And the
NASA/USgovt review and QA process was adequate for issues like safety
and handling but inadequate for optical quality.

The Hubble backup mirror by Kodak, currently in storage, is essentially
perfect.

Hubble board, requested by NASA to review the Hughes Danbury (nee Perkin-
Elmer) work on the mirrors for AXAF, gives it a clean bill of health.
Communications with management have improved greatly, and QA and review
people involved are on the ball this time.

Hubble image of Saturn, showing the huge white storm in the planet's
equatorial region, now planetwide.  Despite the mirror problems, the
Hubble image is 3-10 times better than Earth-based ones, and at least
400 images of the storm are planned.

Soviets launch Gorizont comsat for internal use... not by the whole USSR,
but on contract to the Russian Soviet Federated Republic, a first.

Tenth operational Navstar launched by a new Delta version.  This Delta
has new lightweight strap-ons from Hercules, replacing the old Thiokol
ones, and a higher-expansion nozzle on the main engine.

Letter from Cathleen S. Lewis of the National Air and Space Museum,
questioning AW&ST's calculations of the size of the Soviet space budget.
She says that the ruble-dollar exchange rate AW&ST assumed -- 0.56R/$ --
is no longer even the USSR official rate.  The official rate is now
1.80R/$ for commercial use and 5.90R/$ for tourism [!], and the black-
market rate, which economists consider by far the most realistic, is
20-40R/$.  At the lowest black-market rate, the annual operating budget
of the Soviet space program is circa $325M, about the budget of the
Smithsonian!
-- 
"The average pointer, statistically,    |Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
points somewhere in X." -Hugh Redelmeier| henry@zoo.toronto.edu   utzoo!henry